Stranded cruise ships have become a symbol of the COVID-19 pandemic. Passengers and crew are desperate to get off but the ports to which they’ve headed don’t want them.
It is no exaggeration to suggest this crisis could spell the end of the line for a industry already on the nose for its social, health and environmental problems.
That model has to do with flags of convenience.
Flags of convenience mean ships operate in waters far from their “home” ports. Most are registered in Caribbean tax havens. Operating outside clear jurisdictions, wages are low and working conditions poor.
That so many ships have become floating coronavirus incubators also indicates poor health and safety protocols. An emergency plan for an infectious outbreak on a ship seems an obvious thing to have. Yet reports suggest improvised responses.
Now, with ports and entire nations ordering cruise ships away, flags of convenience have become an existential threat to crew, and the industry.
Ships ordered away
The industry’s reputational crisis is demonstrated no better than in Australia, where 24 of the nation’s 61 confirmed COVID-19 deaths so far have come from cruise ships.
All 20 cruise ships still in Australian waters were ordered to leave last week, with Australian Border Force commissioner Michael Outram citing concerns the number of cases among crew would be “a big strain on the Australian health system”.
Police are now investigating possible criminal charges against the operator, Princess Cruises, for misleading authorities about the situation. (The ship has since been allowed to dock at Port Kembla, south of Sydney, with a fifth of more than 1,000 crew quarantined aboard showing virus-like symptoms).
There are also calls for a criminal negligence investigation of the operator of the Artania, in a weeks-long stand-off in Western Australian waters.Richard Wainwright/AAP
Most of the ship’s passengers were allowed to disembark and get charter flights home to Europe. But more than 400 people, mostly crew, remain on board, and the state government fears the number of coronavirus cases would overwhelm local hospitals.
“We’d like you to leave, we don’t want you in our port,” said West Australian premier Mark McGowan.
But where are they, and tens of thousands of crew workers on hundreds of other cruise ships around the world, to go?
Caribbean tax shelters
Consider the Artenia. The ship is owned by British cruise line P&O, chartered to a German company, operates out of Frankfurt and is registered in the Bahamas.
The Ruby Princess operates out of Australia but is registered in Bermuda. Its owner, Princess Cruises, is headquartered in California but also incorporated in Bermuda.
Most cruise ships are registered in a country different to ownership or operation. More than two-thirds (by tonnage) fly the flags of just three nations – the Bahamas, Panama and Bermuda.
For crew, particularly those in “lower level” service jobs, pay and conditions are poor. Many accept such conditions to earn money for their families. Hidden from view, even passengers can be oblivious to their conditions.
Incorporations of convenience
Both P&O and Princess Cruises are subsidiaries of the world’s biggest cruise company, Carnival Corporation, whose combined fleet of about 300 ships carries almost half the world’s cruising passengers
Carnival Corporation is headquartered in Miami, as are the second and third biggest cruise corporations, Royal Caribbean and Norwegian. But Carnival is incorporated in Panama, Norwegian in Bermuda, and Royal Caribbean in Liberia.
Now these “incorporations of convenience” threaten their survival. Their revenue has been cut to zero. The US government is offering no assistance because they’re foreign companies and their employees are spread across the world. Other governments are unlikely to do more.
Sailing into the sunset
If that happens, many will not mourn the loss.
It has contributed to overtourism in places like Barcelona, Reykjavik, Dubrovnik and Venice. Its environmental record is appalling. Just last year Carnival paid $US20 million (A$28 million) to settle a US court case over it allowing its ships to dump rubbish in the ocean – something for which it has a previous criminal conviction.
Now the industry’s carefully honed image of cruise ships offering the right balance between fun and security looks sunk.
Whatever remains after this crisis will need a complete overhaul.
- ^ gross (www.watoday.com.au)
- ^ infectious outbreak on a ship (theconversation.com)
- ^ improvised responses (www.nytimes.com)
- ^ 20 cruise ships (newsroom.abf.gov.au)
- ^ Explainer: what are Australia's obligations to cruise ships off its coast under international law? (theconversation.com)
- ^ to 18 deaths (www.smh.com.au)
- ^ Artenia (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ Voyager of the Seas (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ Celebrity Solistice (www.illawarramercury.com.au)
- ^ Ovation of the Seas (www.nzherald.co.nz)
- ^ believed there was low risk (www.health.nsw.gov.au)
- ^ Police are now investigating (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ overwhelm local hospitals (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ weekly wrap (theconversation.com)
- ^ least regulated (huelladigital.univisionnoticias.com)
- ^ offering no assistance (www.nytimes.com)
- ^ Industry analysts say (www.nytimes.com)
- ^ social and environment (www.forbes.com)
- ^ something for which it has a previous criminal conviction (www.afr.com)
- ^ The travel industry has sparked a backlash against tourists by stressing quantity over quality (theconversation.com)
Authors: Freya Higgins-Desbiolles, Senior Lecturer in Tourism Management, University of South Australia