The two journalists who won this year’s Nobel Peace Prize have become international celebrities overnight. Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov will no doubt benefit from their increased prominence and status. At the same time, the celebrity that comes with the prize will bring a host of other challenges the winners will have to navigate.
Both Ressa and Muratov will likely face similar pressures, especially considering they have worked to combat authoritarianism in two countries (the Philippines and Russia) where the government has actively tried to silence them.
How the award immediately changes lives
Ressa has been lauded for challenging Filipino President Rodrigo Duterte’s deadly anti-drug campaign. Muratov, a Russian journalist, has been honoured for speaking truth to power as one of the founders of a prominent independent newspaper.
Excitement surrounded the winners after the announcement. Ressa, looking visibly shocked in a Zoom panel discussion, shared her gratitude with supporters. Muratov was greeted with flowers and champagne by colleagues.
During Nobel Week in December, the laureates will receive their medals and the money that accompanies the prize. Each will be awarded 5 million Swedish kronor (A$783,000 or US$572,000). The funds will be a welcome boost in their fight for freedom of expression.
Like many Peace Prize laureates before them, Ressa and Muratov will undoubtedly use their acceptance speeches (and other appearances) as an opportunity to advance their causes and condemn repression by authoritarian governments.
This opportunity carries significant weight: the recordings and publications from these events are carefully put together to present the prize winners and their messages in a particular way. They become part of an authoritative archive about the Nobel Peace Prize. In short, their words will be immortalised.
‘The remarkable powers of an Open Sesame’
In the short term, both Ressa and Muratov will benefit from the enormous international exposure they have received. Their messages will be relayed by media outlets around the world. The journalism profession is also benefiting, given the stature of the prize.
Previous winners were able to reap the benefits of their skyrocketing fame in various ways. For example, Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, an Argentine artist and human rights activist who won the Peace Prize in 1980, suddenly found he had access to senior US lawmakers and European government officials.
[…] things you said before you got the Nobel Peace Prize and not too many people paid attention. You say the same things [afterwards], and people think it’s pearls from Heaven.
Increased scrutiny and tensions with colleagues
However, celebrity comes with increased levels of scrutiny. The world keeps a close eye on Nobel Peace Prize winners, and outcries are common after even the smallest missteps, especially in the age of social media.
Recently, for example, women’s education activist Malala Yousafzai, who became the world’s youngest Nobel Prize laureate in 2014, questioned the institution of marriage in a British Vogue interview, provoking fury in her native Pakistan.
How the prize winnings are spent is always a major focus of attention. This extends to the humanitarian organisations created by the winners — and the way others use donated funds.
For example, former US President Barack Obama, the 2009 laureate, donated his winnings to 10 different charities; the head of one of these charities admitted in 2014 to mismanaging and personally profiting from the money.
The awarding of the Peace Prize also sometimes creates tension between the winners and their colleagues. This is partly because of the Nobel Foundation rules, which state that a Nobel Prize can’t be given to more than three people in a given year.
So, while some winners become overnight celebrities, their former colleagues are sometimes sidelined. Perhaps most sensationally, the 1997 awarding of the prize to Jody Williams and the International Campaign to Ban Landmines led to bitter in-fighting within the organisation.
More dire threats from authoritarian regimes
One of the biggest, immediate threats facing both Ressa and Muratov is potential harsh repression from the authorities in their home countries.
Over the years, many Peace Prize winners – and their supporters – have faced severe repercussions after winning the award.
For example, Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo spent years in detention for “inciting subversion of state power” until his death in 2017. The Chinese government depicted him as a stooge of the west and blocked information about him online. His wife spent nearly eight years in house arrest despite never having been charged with a crime.
Other winners, such as Myanmar pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and Iranian political activist Shirin Ebadi, also had to weather political backlashes. For this reason, one commentator has pointed out the Peace Prize sometimes brings little peace.
Tensions may already be appearing in Russia following Muratov’s win. Even though the Kremlin congratulated Muratov – calling him “talented” and “brave” – authorities have begun to label other journalists and media organisations “foreign agents”.
Supporters of the imprisoned opposition leader Alexei Navalny have also expressed disappointment over the choice of winner, as well as Muratov’s approach of trying to engage with Russia’s leaders.
When we came under attack, there wasn’t really any other choice, the phrase we used is ‘hold the line’.
- ^ Maria Ressa (theconversation.com)
- ^ Dmitry Muratov (theconversation.com)
- ^ researched (dx.doi.org)
- ^ Maria Ressa: Nobel prize-winner risks life and liberty to hold Philippines government to account (theconversation.com)
- ^ shared her gratitude (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ Nobel peace prize: how Dmitry Muratov built Russia's 'bravest' newspaper, Novaya Gazeta (theconversation.com)
- ^ carefully put together (dx.doi.org)
- ^ one scholar (www.reaktionbooks.co.uk)
- ^ According to one analysis (books.google.com)
- ^ remarked (dx.doi.org)
- ^ questioned the institution of marriage (www.npr.org)
- ^ admitted in 2014 (www.mhpbooks.com)
- ^ The Nobel Prizes’ controversial push for popularity (theconversation.com)
- ^ led to bitter in-fighting (www.nytimes.com)
- ^ stooge of the west (www.npr.org)
- ^ blocked information (edition.cnn.com)
- ^ spent nearly eight years (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ has pointed out (foreignpolicy.com)
- ^ congratulated (www.aljazeera.com)
- ^ have begun to label (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ expressed disappointment (www.nytimes.com)
- ^ continued with ferocity (qz.com)
- ^ has said (qz.com)