The Bulletin


.

Russia’s alleged deportation of Ukrainian children has caused a UN standoff – what international law says and why it matters

  • Written by Claire Breen, Professor of Law, University of Waikato
Russia’s alleged deportation of Ukrainian children has caused a UN standoff – what international law says and why it matters

The New Zealand government’s sanctioning[1] of Russian commissioner for children’s rights Maria Lvova-Belova is a further[2] demonstration of its concern over alleged war crimes in Ukraine. But it is only a small step in what will likely be a very long road to justice.

In March, the reported removal[3] of Ukrainian children from Russian-occupied territory to Russia itself triggered the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants[4] for Russian president Vladimir Putin and Lvova-Belova.

The warrants allege the transfer of children to the Russian Federation is unlawful: such actions are war crimes under the Rome Statute[5] of the International Criminal Court. Lvova-Belova and Putin have rejected the accusations, with Putin having claimed the issue would be raised[6] at the United Nations Security Council in early April.

Russia – controversially[7] – now holds the council presidency for the month, but has faced immediate resistance. Because of Lvova-Belova’s involvement, Britain has blocked a planned UN webcast[8] of an informal council meeting to discuss the deportation issue.

Meanwhile, the war continues to have a profound impact on children. Hundreds have been killed[9] in indiscriminate attacks, schools have been disrupted[10], some two million have been made refugees[11] or are living in extreme poverty[12]. The deportation of children simply piles misery onto misery.

Maria Lvova-Belova at an April 4 press conference to address accusations that Russia is deporting Ukrainian children. Getty Images

Families during war

The issue of unlawful deportation or transfer of children goes to the heart of international law around the protection of children, which dates back almost a century. The 1924 Declaration on the Rights of the Child[13] originated in efforts to look after the child victims of World War I.

After World War II, the impact of war on humanity in general was recognised in the UN Charter[14], which aimed to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war” and “to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights”.

Read more: International Criminal Court has cited Russia's deportation of Ukrainian children a war crime: on Russia's long history of weaponising deportation[15]

Those twin ideals were further elaborated on in a number of international legal instruments. Protection of the family, as the natural and fundamental social unit, and of children and childhood, is central to these. Such rights and obligations apply in peacetime as well as during war.

The importance of these values accumulated over decades until the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child[16] was agreed in 1989. The deportation of children violates various fundamental children’s rights, including their right to:

  • know and be cared for by their parents

  • preserve their identity, including their name, nationality and family relations

  • be free from unlawful interference with their family.

There are strict rules around the separation of children from their parents. Adoption is permitted only in certain circumstances, with inter-country adoption a last resort.

Russian Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, gives a press briefing as Russia assumes presidency of the Security Council. Getty Images

Special protection for children

As the arrest warrants attest, the deportation of children is a grave breach of international humanitarian law (the rules countries must obey during war). At the centre sit the four Geneva Conventions[17] of 1949, and their additional protocols from 1977. The specific aim of these treaties is to protect those who do not take part in hostilities, known as “protected persons”.

Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, children are entitled to special protection[18], with rules aimed at protecting their relationships with their parents and families. States must ensure the welfare[19] of children who have been orphaned or separated from their families, and must attempt to reunite families separated[20] by conflict.

Read more: Are Russian transfers of Ukrainian children to re-education and adoption facilities a form of genocide?[21]

The evacuation of children[22] is permitted during the course of hostilities, although the rules around this were tightened in 1977[23].

But it is the rules around occupied territories[24] that are key to the arrest warrants for Putin and Lvova-Belova. Occupying powers are prohibited from deporting protected persons[25], including children, from occupied territory to the territory of the occupying power (or to any other country).

Occupying powers must also facilitate the identification[26] of children and the registration of their parents, and they must not change children’s personal status. Essentially, they must not fracture the relationship[27] between children and their families.

Read more: Family separations in Ukraine highlight the importance of children's rights[28]

No impunity

Deportation to the territory of an occupying power heightens the risk that the identity and nationality of such children will be erased, particularly where the deported children are adopted.

But the implications don’t stop at the children themselves, because the continued existence of any group depends on its children. This means the forcible transfer of children from one group to another may also violate the 1948 Genocide Convention[29] if done with the intent to “destroy a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, completely or partially”.

The Rome Statute also includes the forcible transfer of children within the crime of genocide, which is a crime against humanity. But the arrest warrants for Putin and Lvova-Belova do not include these particular crimes.

Read more: Prosecuting Putin for abducting Ukrainian children will require a high bar of evidence – and won't guarantee the children can come back home[30]

It’s sadly ironic, in light of the arrest warrants and Russia’s presidency of the Security Council this month, that the council not long ago stated[31] “the protection of children should be part of a comprehensive strategy to resolve conflict and sustain peace”.

Russia’s actions must also be examined in light of legal obligatons[32] under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Fourth Geneva Convention and the Genocide Convention. There is a long legal road ahead, but the principle is clear: impunity for crimes committed against children in times of war is not an option.

References

  1. ^ sanctioning (www.stuff.co.nz)
  2. ^ further (www.icc-cpi.int)
  3. ^ reported removal (hub.conflictobservatory.org)
  4. ^ arrest warrants (www.icc-cpi.int)
  5. ^ Rome Statute (www.icc-cpi.int)
  6. ^ would be raised (apnews.com)
  7. ^ controversially (www.cnbc.com)
  8. ^ blocked a planned UN webcast (www.theguardian.com)
  9. ^ have been killed (www.cnbc.com)
  10. ^ been disrupted (www.savethechildren.net)
  11. ^ made refugees (www.unicef.org)
  12. ^ living in extreme poverty (www.savethechildren.net)
  13. ^ Declaration on the Rights of the Child (www.un-documents.net)
  14. ^ UN Charter (www.un.org)
  15. ^ International Criminal Court has cited Russia's deportation of Ukrainian children a war crime: on Russia's long history of weaponising deportation (theconversation.com)
  16. ^ Convention on the Rights of the Child (www.ohchr.org)
  17. ^ four Geneva Conventions (www.icrc.org)
  18. ^ special protection (www.worldlii.org)
  19. ^ ensure the welfare (ihl-databases.icrc.org)
  20. ^ reunite families separated (ihl-databases.icrc.org)
  21. ^ Are Russian transfers of Ukrainian children to re-education and adoption facilities a form of genocide? (theconversation.com)
  22. ^ evacuation of children (ihl-databases.icrc.org)
  23. ^ tightened in 1977 (ihl-databases.icrc.org)
  24. ^ rules around occupied territories (ihl-databases.icrc.org)
  25. ^ prohibited from deporting protected persons (ihl-databases.icrc.org)
  26. ^ facilitate the identification (ihl-databases.icrc.org)
  27. ^ must not fracture the relationship (ihl-databases.icrc.org)
  28. ^ Family separations in Ukraine highlight the importance of children's rights (theconversation.com)
  29. ^ Genocide Convention (www.un.org)
  30. ^ Prosecuting Putin for abducting Ukrainian children will require a high bar of evidence – and won't guarantee the children can come back home (theconversation.com)
  31. ^ stated (www.securitycouncilreport.org)
  32. ^ legal obligatons (ihl-databases.icrc.org)

Read more https://theconversation.com/russias-alleged-deportation-of-ukrainian-children-has-caused-a-un-standoff-what-international-law-says-and-why-it-matters-202430

The Conversation