New report reveals grim lack of progress to cut overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander kids in out-of-home-care
- Written by Sharynne Hamilton, Senior Research Fellow, Co-Head, Aboriginal Health and Wellbeing, Telethon Kids Institute
The latest Family Matters report[1] reveals a grim lack of progress to eliminate the overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out-of-home care.
The report – released by the Secretariat of National Aboriginal and Islander Child Care[2], a national non-governmental peak body for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children – reveals:
there are there more than 22,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out-of-home care
our children are being removed as infants and not being placed with kin
they are staying in care long-term and without reunification plans.
The report notes significant spending at the statutory end of the system (where removals take place). It highlights underspending on family support that could avoid such removals.
And there is inconsistent resourcing and support for Aboriginal community controlled organisations. As a result, we’re not seeing positive outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in state care.
The report calls for funding and support for Aboriginal community controlled organisations (sometimes abbreviated as ACCOs). They are best placed to lead reform and to make decisions about the safety and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.
Read more: Thirteen years after 'Sorry', too many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are still being removed from their homes[3]
Disappointing findings
Alarmingly, the report notes:
the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out-of-home care has continued to increase at a higher rate than the overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in cases of substantiated child neglect or abuse.
This suggests our children are being removed with insufficient evidence or cause. (A “substantiated” case means authorities found cause for removal after investigating the case).
The report also found that when in care, our children are more likely than their non-Indigenous peers to suffer physical, sexual or emotional abuse. They are equally likely to experience neglect. The very system set up to provide care and protection perpetrates abuse.
Unacceptable, but not new
Repeated inquiries[4] have reported abuse and poor outcomes experienced by children in state care. Despite this, there’s been little to no impact on policy or practice.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children continue to be removed at a heartbreakingly young ages. Nationally, our children under 12 months are being removed at ten times the rate of non-Indigenous children and there are increasing fears of future “stolen generations”[5].
The report also found Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children spend more time in care on permanent orders and are adopted at high rates. Reunification rates are low.
Thousands of our children are in long-term care arrangements with no identified family reunification goals. But where our children were reunified, more than 84%[6] did not return to care in the first 12 months.
The report found incarcerated Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are at increased risk of infant removal.
We don’t know how many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mothers are involved with both the criminal justice and child protection systems. That information is not collected. But without it, it’s impossible to plan services, programs and facilities to support incarcerated women to maintain connection with their children.
Once removed from their families, our children are disproportionately being placed with non-Indigenous carers.
This practice continues to increase around Australia, despite every state and territory having committed to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander child placement principle[7] (which prioritises placement of children with kin).
The report notes Aboriginal community controlled organisations are frequently working to support families while simultaneously navigating “unhelpful government systems”.
Emerging work on the experiences of community workers advocating for families with child protection involvement finds many of these workers are operating in risk-averse environments[8], and experience marginalisation and oppression[9].
These barriers hinder the chance of supporting families and must be better understood and avoided.
A last resort
The removal of our children from their families must only happen as a last resort. The same can be said of incarceration of pregnant Aboriginal women and mothers with children, and the placement of our children with non-Indigenous carers.
Without significant sector reform, the number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out-of-home care will continue to balloon. History tells us they will likely suffer poor life outcomes.
Central to successful reform is supporting and resourcing Aboriginal community controlled organisations, which have a track record of successfully delivering community programs[10]. Community ownership and control over decision-making is key.
The report calls on us not to look away, saying:
We urge you to remember that every number you see is a child with a name and dreams for their future. These children are separated from their families in numbers that have not been in seen history.
It is imperative our children grow up knowing who they are, where they belong, and are immersed in their kin, culture and language.
Read more: Attending school every day counts – but kids in out-of-home care are missing out[11]
References
- ^ Family Matters report (www.familymatters.org.au)
- ^ Secretariat of National Aboriginal and Islander Child Care (www.snaicc.org.au)
- ^ Thirteen years after 'Sorry', too many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are still being removed from their homes (theconversation.com)
- ^ Repeated inquiries (theconversation.com)
- ^ future “stolen generations” (www.sciencedirect.com)
- ^ more than 84% (www.familymatters.org.au)
- ^ Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander child placement principle (www.aihw.gov.au)
- ^ risk-averse environments (www.tandfonline.com)
- ^ marginalisation and oppression (journals.sagepub.com)
- ^ successfully delivering community programs (aifs.gov.au)
- ^ Attending school every day counts – but kids in out-of-home care are missing out (theconversation.com)